Skip to content

Breast Augmentation

Should I get breast implants over or under the muscle?

My surgeon gave me the option of submuscular or subglandular placement. What are the pros and cons?

Perspectives
1 doctor answer
Read by
699 patients

Clinical perspectives

How a doctor thinks through this question.

These answers are educational. A doctor who has examined you may reach a different conclusion for reasons specific to your care.
01Featured perspective
D

Dr. David Kim

Board-Certified Plastic Surgeon, MD, FACS

Under the muscle (submuscular) is chosen about 80% of the time and for good reason: the muscle provides extra tissue coverage, making the implant edges less visible and reducing the risk of visible rippling. It also produces a more natural slope in the upper pole. The downsides are a slightly longer recovery and a temporary animation deformity (implant movement during chest flexion). Over the muscle (subglandular) has a shorter recovery, no animation deformity, and can look more projected. However, it carries higher risks of visible edges and rippling, especially in thin patients, and a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture. If you have very little natural breast tissue, under the muscle is almost always better. If you have moderate existing tissue and want a perkier look, over the muscle can work well. A newer option—dual-plane placement—combines benefits of both by partially placing the implant under the muscle.

13 patients found this helpful · February 2026

Keep researching breast augmentation

Move from one answer to the whole decision.

See the result, understand the procedure, and build a shortlist around work that feels relevant to you.

One answer is a starting point

The next useful question is what this means for you.

Explore relevant work, notice what you like, and use that evidence to make your next consultation more specific.

Explore real resultsBrowse more questions