Breast augmentation costs: Breast Augmentation Cost 2026

50 normalized practice websites; lowest eligible own-fee amount per website. Nearest-rank p25 and p75; checked October 16, 2026. Different fee bases; advertisements rather than paid bills.

39 normalized practice websites; lowest eligible own-fee amount per website. Nearest-rank p25 and p75; checked October 16, 2026. Different fee bases; advertisements rather than paid bills.

The middle half describes one lowest eligible own-fee amount per normalized practice website within each fill type. The endpoints are nearest-rank quartiles of those website amounts. A website with several prices contributes one starting point to that scope, while a website pricing both fills can contribute separately to each figure. That doesn’t establish independent ownership or how much patients paid. The full research contains 465 retained price observations, with starting prices, ranges, cash schedules and differing inclusions.

Higher-priced websites and lower-priced promotions both remain in the source record. A starting amount has no published upper limit. Ask whether the advertised surgeon, implant, payment method and operating location apply to your case before treating it as a possible quote. The two middle-half figures can help you read advertisements; they cannot tell you what most people spend.

latest statistics; data year not on page. Implant augmentation; excludes anesthesia, operating room and related expenses; not an all-in price. ASPS own cost page confirms figure; no data year printed. Excludes anesthesia, OR and related costs. Separate fat-grafting average is not an implant figure.

2022 Databank. Webpage says standard procedure surgeon and facility fees; not all-in. Historical 2022 Databank. Webpage says surgeon plus facility; original report page 16 says Aesthetic Plastic Surgeon Fees. Preserve unresolved basis discrepancy, not a current all-in estimate.

2022. Original report surgeon-fee heading; webpage says surgeon/facility, unresolved basis discrepancy. Historical 2022 report; page 16 visually verified. Surgeon-fee heading confirmed; webpage definition differs. Do not silently resolve or pool.

2026 ASQ360 study; article August 7, 2026. Lender-published procedure estimate; not surgeon-only society figure or practice quote Includes implants or fat transfer; not implant-only.. August 7, 2026 article cites 2026 ASQ360 study across 50 states/DC; augmentation definition includes implants OR fat transfer, not an implant-only sample.

2026 ASQ360 study; article August 7, 2026. Lender-published procedure range, not a promise patient quote; do not pool with other survey Includes implants or fat transfer; not implant-only.. 2026 ASQ360 study; lender-published range, not patient quote. Mixed augmentation modalities and unstated all-in inclusions.

2023 ASQ360 study; article December 20, 2024. Different lender article/data vintage from 2026 $6,721; report side by side, no averaging. December 20, 2024 article cites 2023 ASQ360 study across 50 states/DC. Different data vintage from 2026 guide.

2023 ASQ360 study; article December 20, 2024. Different scope/method/vintage; not a practice price. December 20, 2024 article; 2023 ASQ360 data. Preserve article/range vintage and never pool with 2026 study.

CareCredit’s August 7, 2026 article reports $6,721 and a $4,667–$11,186 range from its 2026 ASQ360 study across 50 states and DC. Its definition includes implants or fat transfer, so it isn’t an implant-only comparison. The lender’s December 20, 2024 article instead reports $7,149 and $5,100–$18,465 from 2023 ASQ360 data. Different dates, methods and procedure definitions prevent reading those amounts as a price trend.

The source pages don’t provide a usable patient denominator for estimating your odds of paying a particular amount. Keep their own labels beside the figures. A benchmark helps explain what a source is counting; it doesn’t repair an unitemized quote. Compare your surgeon’s proposed operation, anesthesia, facility, implant and follow-up against the actual inclusion list before using any published average as a budget. The source definitions are part of the number.

In particular, a primary-and/or-revision fee category cannot answer what a first-time silicone patient will pay at a particular facility. Keep an estimate for the proposed operation beside the benchmark so the comparison stays specific.

Read “all-inclusive” alongside the actual list. The University’s page explicitly identifies the implant and operating facility. A different practice may include the surgeon and office visits while leaving anesthesia or the surgical center unpriced. A garment may mean the first surgical bra, without saying anything about later replacements. Follow-up can mean routine visits with the operating surgeon, without promising that urgent evaluation, imaging or another operation is included.

Ask who sends each bill and whether payment to the surgeon settles the facility and anesthesia balances. Make sure your quote names the implant model or allowed device choices, the operating location and the procedures planned. Keep the exclusions attached to the signed estimate. If a test, prescription or clearance is ordered elsewhere, ask that provider for a separate estimate. Don’t add imagined fees to fill a gap; ask the office to name and price the missing service.

A complete written quote gives you something you can compare line by line. Ask whether routine follow-up stays with the operating practice and whether a visit elsewhere would generate another bill. A website’s promise of office visits doesn’t establish payment for outside care. Keep the contact details for each biller with your estimate.

The Aesthetic Society describes different price categories for traditional saline, silicone gel, structured saline and cohesive gel, without supplying a current brand-specific local fee. A silicone label alone doesn’t identify the device model, surface or warranty. ASPS describes saline as a salt-water-filled device; the fill comparison drawing explains contents rather than ranking implants. A surgeon can recommend a particular device for your anatomy and goals, but the price needs to say what was selected.

Ask whether the amount changes for the proposed brand, gel or profile, and whether the alternative quote uses the same surgeon, anesthesia and facility. Don’t subtract the lowest saline advertisement from the highest silicone advertisement to invent an upgrade charge. Those offers can come from different businesses with different exclusions. A broad “gummy bear” phrase also doesn’t establish a specific model or included warranty.

Keep your implant identification card after surgery so future imaging, recall checks and benefit questions can refer to the actual device.

“Implant type not stated” means the priced offer doesn’t isolate saline from silicone. It doesn’t mean no implant is included. Conversely, a brand named elsewhere on the website doesn’t prove that brand is included in the particular promotion. Keep the evidence attached to the offer that actually mentions it. Some pages describe an area’s prices before discussing their own services; that area statement remains a market observation even if the practice wrote the article.

A separate technique-not-stated category covers pages whose priced description can include implants or fat transfer. Svelta and Henry Mentz publish shared technique offers, so those amounts aren’t isolated implant-only fees. The figures keep these categories apart. When you contact a practice, use its exact promotion or page and ask for the device, surgeon and payment conditions attached to it.

If the office supplies a new written estimate, compare that document rather than assuming a missing field from general website copy. Unspecified pricing is a reason to ask for details.

Revision or exchange span $2,000 to $8,000 at Dr K Miami to $22,000 to $33,000 at Sadrian Plastic Surgery across 59 eligible own-fee observations, checked October 16, 2026. Dr K Miami’s lower endpoint is labelled an approximate average in its own schedule; it isn’t a binding quote. Sadrian’s upper revision offer includes a lift. Other-procedure combinations also remain separate.

Kamran Azad’s starting offer includes internal support, while Christopher Patronella’s larger combination includes tummy tuck and several liposuction areas as well as silicone augmentation/lift. Patronella’s printed total conflicts with its printed component sum. The figure preserves the posted total and warning without replacing it with our arithmetic. A package price cannot tell you the isolated implant portion, and subtracting another website’s lift fee won’t reveal it.

Ask for the proposed combined operation and any separately priced alternatives in writing. If you are considering a lift, fat transfer, implant exchange or removal, use the linked guides for those decisions. Their operative work, recovery and billing can differ from a first augmentation. Don’t treat a bundled discount as evidence that you need an additional operation.

ASPS describes placement behind breast tissue and above pectoral muscle.

ASPS describes submuscular placement; ask how much muscle coverage your plan provides.

Ask whether support material, a lift or fat transfer is separately planned and priced. No universal placement surcharge is established here.

The drawing separates breast tissue, muscle and implant position so the quote can name the operation clearly. Partial muscle coverage doesn’t mean that muscle wraps around the entire device. Placement is a clinical planning choice, and a public price page that names one plane doesn’t establish the fee for another. Eugene Kim’s January 2016 video identifies implants, anesthesiologist fees and operating-room time as cost drivers without stating a fee or universal placement premium.

Ask whether changing the proposed plane changes the expected operative work, facility time or follow-up plan in your case. If the surgeon proposes support material, a lift or fat transfer too, have those additions named. Don’t assume that a higher price establishes a better plane or that a less expensive quote means the same operation. The candidacy and placement guides explain the tradeoffs in more detail.

For price comparison, you need enough detail to check that both offices are quoting the same procedure and identifying any differences that matter to your anatomy.

Name the fold, areola or armpit approach discussed with your surgeon.

A lift changes the operation and belongs in its own combined quote.

Ask about incision checks, dressings, prescriptions and any separately billed wound care. ASPS guidance checked October 16, 2026.

A fold, areola or armpit approach describes access to the implant pocket. It doesn’t by itself tell you which implant, anesthesia or facility the surgeon has priced. If a quote changes after examination, ask the office to explain whether the change concerns the device, surgical work, operating setting or an additional procedure. An incision for a lift is a different planning issue from an implant access incision, so a combined augmentation-and-lift estimate belongs in the combined scope.

Ask what routine incision checks, dressings and garment instructions are included, and where unexpected wound care would be billed. You don’t need to choose access based on an unsupported price hierarchy. The useful comparison is a written plan that explains why the surgeon recommends the approach and what it includes. The drawing is an orientation aid, not a surgical recommendation or an illustration of the scar you will have.

Bring the same questions to each consultation so a technique name doesn’t obscure differences elsewhere in the quote.

MENTOR’s included gel plan offers lifetime qualifying rupture replacement and up to $3,500 of qualifying rupture expenses for 10 years. Included Baker III/IV contracture assistance is up to $2,000 for 2 years, with no prior contracture for financial assistance. Enhanced gel costs $300 within 45 days and extends specified benefits. Saline’s included plan provides qualifying device replacement; Enhanced costs $200 within 45 days and lists up to $2,400 for 10 years. Surgeries before January 1, 2021 use their original terms.

Natrelle gel lists lifetime qualifying rupture replacement and up to $3,500 of out-of-pocket assistance for 10 years. Baker III/IV contracture has 10-year device replacement but up to $2,000 for 2 years for augmentation, limited to one incident; recurrence is excluded. Saline Premier costs $200 within 45 days and lists up to $2,400 for qualifying deflation expenses over 10 years; saline contracture isn’t covered. Size dissatisfaction and specified procedure-related damage are excluded. The surgeon must contact Product Surveillance before surgery.

Sientra’s applicable Platinum20 terms cover eligible implants placed on or after May 1, 2018. Qualifying rupture has lifetime device replacement and a one-time payment up to $5,000 within 20 years for eligible costs not otherwise paid or waived. Qualifying contracture, double capsule or late seroma has up to $2,000 for 2 years. Surgeon tracking is required within 60 days; preauthorization precedes revision and products/documents are due within 30 days after explant. Only the highest applicable cash benefit applies; lost wages and dissatisfaction are excluded.

Motiva’s 2024 US contract applies to qualifying implantation on or after September 26, 2024. Included qualifying rupture replacement is lifetime, with up to $3,500 once for eligible uncovered costs within 10 years. Included contracture assistance is up to $2,000 once within 2 years. Plus costs $250 within 90 days of implantation and lists up to $5,000 once for qualifying rupture within 10 years. Prior contracture with another brand and prior textured devices can affect eligibility. Registration confirmation, preauthorization and product return matter.

Get the exact brand, model and warranty document applicable to your implantation date. A practice that lists several brands hasn’t promised every brand at the advertised price. The cards below use each manufacturer’s own terms rather than a competitor’s comparison chart. Device replacement can leave surgeon, anesthesia, facility, imaging and time-off costs. A cash ceiling is a maximum conditional benefit, not the amount everyone receives. Appearance or size dissatisfaction and specified procedure-related damage can be excluded.

Before another operation, the surgeon may need authorization and a plan for returning the removed device. Motiva’s live summary and 2024 contract differ in how some event benefits and prior-texture exclusions are presented; ask the manufacturer which full terms apply. Its unusual BIA-ALCL event-definition requirements remain an unresolved warranty-text issue, not diagnostic guidance. Its Femtech Freedom credit also incorporates separate terms that weren’t fully established in the accessed contract.

Don’t choose a device on the assumption that a headline warranty removes future financial responsibility. Sientra also requires qualifying surgery by a licensed physician who is board-certified or board-admissible in plastic surgery. Its contract requires documented actual out-of-pocket expenses and a patient liability release for benefits. Ask the office to explain these conditions before you rely on the program, and keep the full agreement with your implant records.

Ask who will order the screening, where it can be performed and which provider can explain the result and arrange next steps. MRI is recommended for symptoms or an equivocal ultrasound under the labeling guidance. Implant-integrity surveillance is separate from breast-cancer screening; one doesn’t replace the other. A low advertised ultrasound fee isn’t a complete diagnostic-care budget, and this packet establishes no current national MRI cash price.

Ask the imaging provider and your insurer for the relevant estimate rather than multiplying an assumed scan price over a lifetime. FDA cautions that monitoring, removal or replacement may be uninsured even when complications occur. Keep screening costs apart from a possible replacement operation. Revision can involve different work and a new device, and a manufacturer warranty may cover only an eligible part of the expenses. The revision cost guide covers those quotes.

Ask what follow-up the original practice provides if you move, change insurers or need care years later. Keeping your implant card and operative records makes that conversation more specific.

Read the city printed beside each row. A surgeon can market to a larger metro while operating in a nearby city. The metro grouping makes examples easier to find; it doesn’t turn the sample into a survey of the region. A city with few clear own-fee statements can’t be ranked against one with more advertising.

The displayed examples are selected own-fee offers within saline and silicone scopes, with same-website same-scope statements preserved so a conflicting page isn’t silently resolved. Check the current written quote and treating surgeon before booking. If you are considering travel within the US, compare the entire plan, including the necessary stay, transport, a helper, follow-up visits and how you would receive care after returning home.

This packet gives no complete travel budget or rule that a particular city is cheaper after those costs. A nearby office can still have separately billed services, and a distant package can still exclude expenses. Price alone doesn’t establish surgeon credentials, facility arrangements or the quality of your proposed care.

Crofts MD’s Lindon page posts a $6,000 starting figure with surgeon, operating room and anesthesia stated. Peak Plastic Surgery in Draper has an own-fee $7,000 to $10,000 statement and a separate Utah market discussion at $7,000 to $12,000. Its returned Markdown was readable, but normal browser rendering remained uncertain. The Rose Clinic and Trenton Jones pages describe area prices rather than their own fees.

York Yates MD in Layton lists $10,000 to $11,000 for implant augmentation, $16,000 to $18,000 with a lift and $14,000 to $15,000 for hybrid augmentation, with core fees explicitly included. Its exchange and abdominal combinations stay in their own categories below. Envision Cosmetic Surgery’s Murray homepage starts augmentation at $7,500 without establishing inclusions. Those cities remain attached to the observations even when the websites also serve Salt Lake City.

A Utah page’s generic board-certified wording doesn’t establish that the operating surgeon holds a particular board credential. Ask which physician will operate and verify that person’s actual specialty board separately from the price discussion.

Last review June 25, 2026; next review January 14, 2027. Appearance-only surgery excluded unless source-specific medical necessity/reconstruction applies. Member benefit contract controls. Cosmetic augmentation exclusion; linked reconstructive policies are separate. Full CPB read including limits, codes, background and policy history. Policy text is not a coverage promise.

No policy content date printed on accessed page. Usually excluded; accidental injury or malformed-body-part function exceptions. Usually excluded; accidental-injury/function exceptions and breast reconstruction after cancer mastectomy stated. Prior authorization paragraph names other procedures; not a complete augmentation checklist. Policy text is not a coverage promise.

Effective September 1, 2026; last review July 2026. Functional impairment/no contract exclusion can be medically necessary; not appearance-only entitlement. Full five-page PDF read; pages 1–2 visually verified. Contract language prevails. Conditional functional/reconstructive criteria do not authorize appearance-only augmentation; breast-specific policy 40 separately cross-referenced. Policy text is not a coverage promise.

Effective April 15, 2026; next review January 15, 2027. Silicone rupture confirmed on imaging may qualify under removal criteria; replacement not automatically covered. Full 16-page PDF read; pages 2–3 visually verified. Silicone rupture/extrusion confirmed on imaging may meet removal criteria. Other qualifying conditions and exclusions apply; plan terms govern. Policy text is not a coverage promise.

Effective April 15, 2026; next review January 15, 2027. Replacement excluded unless specified reconstruction-related criteria apply. Replacement/mastopexy after removal listed not medically necessary/cosmetic unless the specified post-mastectomy/lumpectomy reconstruction criteria apply. Covered removal is not covered cosmetic replacement. Policy text is not a coverage promise.

No policy content date printed on accessed page. not found; public access gap is not a coverage decision. Portal only: no augmentation-specific policy established from accessed text. A public access gap is not an approval or denial. No full preauthorization checklist found. Policy text is not a coverage promise.

ASPS says most plans don’t cover cosmetic augmentation and may exclude related complications or appearance revision. Cigna’s policy 0048, effective April 15, 2026, has specified removal criteria, including imaging-confirmed silicone rupture under the applicable branch; replacement remains restricted to its reconstruction-related criteria. Regence’s general Surgery 12 policy, effective September 1, 2026, defers to member contract language and a breast-specific policy.

Its Surgery 40 does not make cosmetic revision broadly covered merely because the patient wants a change; specific medical-necessity and explantation branches require their own review. The accessed Select Health portal established no augmentation-specific decision. That access gap is neither approval nor denial. Before paying a deposit, ask your actual insurer about the planned operation, surgeon, anesthesia provider, facility, prior authorization and exclusions. Ask what you could owe even if part of the operation is covered.

Keep any cosmetic addition and its quote separate from reconstructive services. A practice’s willingness to submit paperwork, someone else’s approval story or a public coverage paragraph cannot substitute for your member benefit and a written patient estimate.

The 4 illustrations below finance the same principal using the rates and terms in the research scenarios. Longer terms can lower the monthly payment while increasing total interest; the different APRs also contribute to these examples’ totals. Payments and total repayment are rounded independently from the unrounded amortization result, so the final payment reconciles the cents.

CFPB explains that deferred-interest promotions can charge interest back to the purchase date if the promotional balance isn’t paid in full on time. A required minimum payment may not clear that balance by the deadline. Ask for the actual APR, fees, term, promotional payoff date and total repayment before accepting an offer. PatientFi, CareCredit, Cherry and Alphaeon descriptions aren’t interchangeable promises of zero interest. Alphaeon’s saved agreement was retained, but a fresh request was blocked.

This guide doesn’t establish your offered terms or qualification. Read the shared cosmetic-surgery financing guide for the borrowing comparison, and preserve room in your budget for prescriptions, help, screening and possible later care rather than treating a monthly advertisement as the full cost of surgery.

Northern California, CA. 2019. patient-reported paid; fee basis not stated. Historical surgery; city not stated. Read October 16, 2026. Not used in posted-price spreads.

Orange County, CA. 2020. patient-reported paid; fee basis not stated. County only; no itemization. Read October 16, 2026. Not used in posted-price spreads.

San Diego, CA. not stated; relative three-year interval. patient-reported paid; fee basis not stated. Keep combined scope; no inferred calendar year. Read October 16, 2026. Not used in posted-price spreads.

The research preserves 25 patient-price observations from 6 source threads, including quotes, payments, alternative plans and nested components. That isn’t a count of independent final bills. The selected examples below keep the reported location, year, procedure and inclusion gaps. The same source can contain several speakers, and a paid-sounding amount can later be clarified as a quote for upcoming surgery. Don’t count the same experience or fee component again as a separate operation.

The two cost videos are also personal accounts: @kimmmycakes describes a historical silicone operation in Miami with travel and hotel separate, while @chanellmays describes a combined lift and implant bundle with currency unstated in speech. Their stories can help you ask what an amount includes, but they don’t validate today’s fee or establish another person’s eligibility. Neither story supplies a complete itemized surgeon, facility and anesthesia invoice.

Use these experiences to identify missing questions in your own estimate rather than to negotiate from an assumed national patient average. The practice’s written offer and the loan contract still need their own review.

Bring the advertisement you saw and ask the office to show how it relates to your estimate. Confirm the operating surgeon’s name, specific specialty board and facility rather than relying on an unspecified board-certified label. Ask what happens if the proposed plan changes after examination, whether the deposit is refundable and when the written quote expires. These are questions for the office; the packet establishes no universal deposit or cancellation policy.

Ask who answers concerns after hours and who provides follow-up if you return home to another city. A complication policy, surgeon-fee waiver and manufacturer warranty are separate documents, so request each applicable set of conditions. Find out whether a possible revision could leave facility and anesthesia charges even if a device or surgeon fee is covered. Keep a copy of the quote, implant information, warranty confirmation and payment agreement.

For breast augmentation before and after, browse the linked photo collection and discuss examples relevant to your anatomy; photos cannot establish the complete price or promise a result. You can take time to compare written answers before committing money to an operation.